Forcible Blood Draw Issue Reviewed by Supreme Court

  • Board Certified Expert

    in DUI Defense

    Chosen as a “Top DUI Attorney” in Orange County & rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo.

    Meet Virginia L. Landry
  • Answers to All of

    Your Questions

    Visit our FAQ page to get answers to some of the most common questions.

    Read Common Questions
  • Get Help

    Immediately

    Don’t wait, time is of the essence. Contact us now for a free case evaluation.

    Get Started Today

Forcible Blood Draw Issue Reviewed by Supreme Court

In 2012, a Colorado driver was involved in an accident that was determined to be related to being under the influence. After being taken to a hospital to check for injury, the driver became unconscious and law enforcement ordered that a blood sample be taken to check their blood alcohol content, showing it to be over three times the legal limit.

As a result of this information, the driver was charged with driving under the influence. In court, the BAC reading and blood sample were excluded from evidence. Why? According to the judge, without a warrant, the blood draw was in violation of the driver’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.

How does the Fourth Amendment apply?

The Fourth Amendment protects a person and their property from being violated through a search and seizure unless a reasonable level of probable cause exists. If law enforcement wants to perform a search and seizure, they must get a warrant from a judge. When it comes to searching a person themselves, it must be done with a warrant unless there was unusual conduct that suggests some criminal activity may exist.

The judge’s decision not to use the blood sample was appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court, stating that the longer the driver was unconscious, the more the alcohol would have dissipated in their system, proving the need for the warrantless blood draw. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the decision to exclude that evidence due to the illegal nature of its acquisition. As the prosecution did not agree with this decision, the legality of the blood draw was brought to the United States Supreme Court.

Under the Supreme Court Case Missouri v. McNeely, it has been outlined that a blood draw is protected under the Fourth Amendment and forcible blood draws must receive a warrant before they are valid. Since this had been decided during this case, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the standard that warrantless blood draws remain illegal.

Categories: DUI
  • Board Certified Expert

    in DUI Defense

    Chosen as a “Top DUI Attorney” in Orange County & rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo.

    Meet Virginia L. Landry
  • Answers to All of

    Your Questions

    Visit our FAQ page to get answers to some of the most common questions.

    Read Common Questions
  • Get Help

    Immediately

    Don’t wait, time is of the essence. Contact us now for a free case evaluation.

    Get Started Today

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Law Offices of Virginia L. Landry, Inc. - Orange County DUI Attorney
Located at 23046 Avenida De La Carlota, Suite 125
Laguna Hills, CA 92653.
View Map
Phone: (877) 384-7833
Local Phone: (949) 585-7400
Website:
© 2017 All Rights Reserved.

When You're

Ready to talk

Our firm is ready to listen. Call for a FREE case consultation.

Call Toll-Free 877.384.7833
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.